Robinhood Ventures Fund II — ticker RVII — is set to start trading on the NYSE on August 13, 2026 at an expected $25 a share, holding 80 Y Combinator-connected startups behind a 2-and-20 fee structure. We've already broken down all 80 companies, position by position, on our interactive RVII dashboard. What's still not disclosed matters just as much: no NAV at listing, no distribution policy. This page tracks both columns — and it gets updated as details drop.
We've covered Robinhood's first venture fund since it listed in March — the holdings, the NAV math, and above all the premium that ran to ~90% and then collapsed. Fund II is a genuinely different product wearing the same wrapper, and the single most useful thing you can do before buying it is understand what happened to Fund I. That story is below, with real prices.
Figures from Robinhood's August 3, 2026 announcement and Form N-2 registration statement, as reported by GlobeNewswire, StreetInsider, and TechTimes.

What Is Robinhood Ventures Fund II?
RVII is a closed-end business development company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 — the same legal wrapper as RVI, and the only structure the SEC permits for a retail-accessible fund holding mostly illiquid private securities. Robinhood announced it August 3, 2026, filed a Form N-2 to offer up to 8 million common shares at an expected $25 each, and ran a share-request window for Robinhood Financial customers and TradePMR Fusion advisers that closed August 12 — one day before the expected NYSE debut. Up to 400,000 of the offered shares are being sold by Robinhood Markets itself.
The mandate is what makes it interesting: instead of chasing the biggest names in the late-stage private market, RVII invests in a diversified portfolio of 80 early-stage companies that are current or former Y Combinator participants, or whose founder or co-founder came through the accelerator. It's closer to buying a slice of YC's pipeline than to buying a stake in any single marquee company — and it reportedly layers leverage on top, amplifying whatever that basket does in both directions.
Confirmed Facts vs. What's Still Undisclosed
Here is every material fact about RVII, labeled honestly. "Confirmed" means it comes from Robinhood's announcement or the registration statement; "expected" means disclosed but subject to final pricing; "not disclosed" means exactly that — and we'll fill those rows in as the filings land.
| Detail | What We Know | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ticker / exchange | RVII on the NYSE | Confirmed |
| First trading day | August 13, 2026 | Expected |
| IPO price | $25.00/share | Expected |
| Structure | Closed-end BDC (1940 Act) | Confirmed |
| Shares offered | Up to 8M (incl. up to 400K sold by Robinhood Markets) | Confirmed |
| Mandate | 80 early-stage companies, 100% YC-connected | Confirmed |
| Largest position | Tasklet — 4.50% (only overweight) | Confirmed |
| Standard weight | ~1.12% each (78 of 80 companies) | Confirmed |
| Cash & equivalents | 7.39% (vs Fund I's 19.78%) | Confirmed |
| Top sector | Technology — 64.31% across 55 companies | Confirmed |
| Base management fee | 2.00% of net assets | Confirmed |
| Incentive fee | 20% of realized capital gains | Confirmed |
| Est. total annual expenses | ~4.18% (per TechTimes' N-2 review) | Expected |
| Leverage | Reportedly ~67% additional exposure on equity | Reported, unconfirmed |
| NAV at listing | — | Not disclosed |
| Distribution / dividend policy | — | Not disclosed |
Sources: Robinhood August 3, 2026 announcement (GlobeNewswire), StreetInsider, TechTimes review of the Form N-2, and our own filing analysis on the RVII dashboard. Rows marked "not disclosed" will be updated as filings publish.
What RVII Holds: 80 Companies, Near-Equal Weights, 100% YC
We went through the disclosed portfolio company by company — the full interactive breakdown of all 80 names, with descriptions, lives on our RVII dashboard. The headline findings: every single holding passes the YC filter (current YC company or YC-alum founder), and the weighting is almost mechanical. 78 of the 80 companies sit at a standard ~1.12% weight. The only overweight is Tasklet, a cloud agent OS, at 4.50%; the only underweight is Luel at 0.45%. Cash and equivalents are 7.39% — well below Fund I's 19.78% cash drag.
By sector, this is overwhelmingly a technology fund: 64.31% of the portfolio across 55 companies. Industrials (8.96%, including defense names like Tenet Industries' strike drones and Apollo Atomics' compact nuclear reactors) come second, then financial services (7.84%), healthcare (6.72%, including CellType's AI drug discovery), consumer cyclical, energy, and communications. The near-equal weighting is the tell for how to think about this fund: nobody is picking winners here. It's a systematic bet that YC's ~1.5% acceptance rate is itself the selection mechanism — a venture index fund on the accelerator's pipeline, not a portfolio manager's conviction list.
64.31%
Technology
55 companies
8.96%
Industrials
8 companies
7.84%
Financial Services
7 companies
6.72%
Healthcare
6 companies
7.39%
Cash
vs 19.78% in Fund I
2.24%
Consumer Cyclical
2 companies
1.12%
Energy
1 company
1.12%
Communications
1 company
How RVII Differs From RVI
Same wrapper, same $25 sticker, nearly opposite bet. RVI concentrated ~73% of NAV in five late-stage giants — SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, Stripe, Databricks — three of which went (or are going) public in 2026, converting the fund into a high-fee wrapper around increasingly buyable stocks. RVII spreads capital across ~80 companies that are years from any IPO, which changes almost every property of the investment:
Concentration → Diversification
A single SpaceX earnings surprise moves RVI's NAV materially. In RVII, no single startup is likely to matter much — you're betting on the YC pipeline's aggregate hit rate, not on any one company's outcome.
Late-stage → Early-stage
RVI's holdings were IPO-ready mega-caps with real secondary-market price discovery. RVII's early-stage positions get marked off far thinner data — meaning NAV is more of an estimate, and stays that way longer.
~2.5% → ~4.18% expenses
Identical 2% headline fee, but RVII adds a 20% incentive fee on realized gains plus a smaller expected asset base spreading fixed costs — pushing estimated total expenses to nearly double RVI's.
Scarcity thesis → Pipeline thesis
RVI's premium was built on scarcity: the only liquid way to own SpaceX and OpenAI. That thesis had an expiration date, and it expired. RVII's thesis — access to YC's deal flow — doesn't expire the same way, but it also lacks the marquee names that made retail chase RVI to $57.
For the deeper side-by-side — fee tables, share counts, stage focus — see our full RVII vs RVI breakdown and our Pulse deep-dive on the RVII IPO published when the fund was announced.
The RVI Lesson: A 90% Premium, Round-Tripped in Ten Weeks
If you read one section on this page before buying RVII, make it this one. RVI listed March 6, 2026 at $25.00 against a $24.70 NAV — essentially fair value. By May 27 it traded at $57.02, roughly 90%+ above the last reported NAV. Buyers at the top were paying almost $1.90 for every $1.00 of underlying private holdings, on the theory that being the only liquid path to SpaceX and OpenAI justified it.
Then the scarcity died on schedule. SpaceX listed on Nasdaq June 12 — and once the market could buy RVI's biggest holding directly, the premium unwound week after week: $35 by mid-June, $26 by mid-July, and $24.81 by the end of July, back below the March listing price. Anyone who bought the May peak was down more than 50% while the underlying portfolio was, if anything, worth more after its top holding's IPO. The bounce to $28.64 by August 12 came only after Robinhood announced RVII — a reminder that these funds trade on narrative, not just NAV.
The mechanism is structural, not a fluke. Closed-end funds have a fixed share count and no arbitrage keeping price near NAV, so the price is purely what the marginal retail buyer will pay. When enthusiasm exceeds float, you get 90% premiums; when the story fades, you get NAV or below — the median closed-end fund trades at a discount. We documented this dynamic in real time across the premium explainer, the premium/discount history, and the discount-history tracker. RVII inherits the exact same structure on day one.
Should You Wait for RVII or Buy RVI?
Honest answer: they're different enough that "which one" is the wrong frame — the real question is what exposure you actually want, and at what price relative to NAV.
RVI makes more sense if you:
- Want exposure to named, knowable companies — you can read exactly what it holds and check the marks yourself
- Prefer the cheaper fee load (~2.5% gross vs ~4.18% estimated for RVII)
- Can buy near NAV — which, after the premium collapse, is actually possible for the first time since March
- Accept that the remaining thesis shrinks as each holding goes public
RVII makes more sense if you:
- Want genuinely early-stage venture exposure — the kind retail has never had a listed wrapper for
- Believe in YC's aggregate pipeline more than in any single company
- Accept a heavier fee drag, reported leverage, and marks that are estimates for years
- Are disciplined enough to wait for the price to settle near NAV instead of chasing the open
And one rule applies to both: the premium you pay at entry matters more than the portfolio. RVI proved that NAV can rise while shareholders lose half their money, purely from premium compression. If RVII opens hot, the RVI chart above is what the other side of that trade looks like. Our five-question premium framework was written for RVI, but every question transfers directly to RVII — as does the step-by-step buying mechanics guide and the closed-end fund tax treatment.
The Complete RVI & RVII Coverage Library
We've tracked the Robinhood Ventures funds since Fund I listed. Everything below is kept current:
RVII is the broader, earlier, more expensive sequel to a fund whose defining event was a premium that appeared and vanished inside five months.
The confirmed facts fit in one table. The undisclosed ones — NAV, holdings, distributions — are what will actually determine whether $25 is a fair price. We'll update this page as each one lands.
This is a living page — last updated August 13, 2026, the day of RVII's expected NYSE debut. Track Fund I's NAV and premium on the Robinhood RVI Fund dashboard, and follow the listing-day coverage on Value Add Pulse. Originally covered in the Trace Cohen newsletter.
Get VC data most people never see
— 100% free
Weekly benchmarks, valuations, and fund data. Join 5,000+ investors. No spam.