Analysis
Sam Altman, Dario Amodei and Demis Hassabis have each, within the past several months, described AI as crossing into a phase where the technology begins accelerating its own development -- language borrowed from decades-old speculative futurism that is now coming from the executives who run the three labs building the systems in question, according to Axios. "We are now, like, in the singularity," Altman said on the Relentless podcast last month. Amodei prefers the term "the AI exponential," and has said Claude is already helping build more powerful AI and could soon automate nearly all AI research and engineering work at Anthropic. Hassabis, who has said the industry is "standing in the foothills of the singularity," is stepping back from day-to-day control of DeepMind to become Alphabet's chief scientist and chair of Google DeepMind.
None of the three has published a benchmark or technical definition for the moment they're describing -- "singularity" and "exponential" are framing choices, not measured thresholds, and each label serves the speaker's own narrative: Altman selling OpenAI's pace, Amodei selling Anthropic's safety-conscious version of the same pace, Hassabis explaining his own transition out of an operating role. The claim is unfalsifiable in the way it's currently being made, which doesn't make it wrong, but does make it marketing until someone attaches a specific, checkable capability milestone to it. Pulse has previously covered the singularity framing each of these labs uses to describe its own progress, and the pattern holds here too: an unfalsifiable claim that flatters whichever company's chief executive is making it.
