Illustration for: Flock Safety: Police Logged 'LMAO' As The Reason For Camera Searches

Flock Safety: Police Logged 'LMAO' As The Reason For Camera Searches

Thousands of police queries against Flock Safety's license plate reader network recorded justifications like 'LMAO,' 'IDK' and 'asdfg,' undercutting the audit log the company points to as its accountability mechanism.

By the Numbers

Thousands
Searches with junk reasons
'LMAO', 'IDK', 'asdfg'
Reasons logged
404 Media
Reported by
Sep 14, 2026
Report date
TC
By the Markets Desk
Edited by Trace Cohen · Early-stage VC & angel · Founder, New York Venture Partners
1 min read
ShareXLinkedInEmail
TC

The VC Read · Trace's Take

Trace Cohen

A free-text audit field is not an audit. Flock built the accountability layer its municipal buyers asked for and then declined to enforce it, and that gap is now in print for every city attorney reviewing a renewal. If you hold this at $8B, model contract non-renewal rate, not litigation risk -- councils do not sue, they just stop signing.

Analysis

Police officers searching Flock Safety's nationwide license plate reader network recorded thousands of queries with justifications including "LMAO," "IDK," "Hehe" and "asdfg," according to 404 Media's review of search logs. The reason field is free text, and nothing in the system requires it to be meaningful.

That matters because the audit log is the product's answer to every civil liberties objection raised against it. When Pulse covered Flock's $8 billion valuation and the surveillance backlash around it in August, the company's public defense rested on the claim that every search is logged, attributable and reviewable by the agency. What changed with this reporting is that the logging is confirmed to exist and confirmed to be unenforced -- the record captures who searched and when, and records nothing usable about why.

For investors holding the position at an $8 billion mark, the exposure is not a lawsuit, it is churn correlated with news cycles.

Flock's business model depends on the distinction holding. The company sells to roughly 5,000 US communities on the premise that automated plate readers are a targeted investigative tool rather than a general dragnet, and municipal contracts increasingly carry audit requirements written into them. A structured reason field with required case numbers is a straightforward engineering change; the fact that it has not been made is a product decision, and it is now a documented one.

The competitive and regulatory context is unfriendly. Motorola Solutions' Vigilant and Axon's fleet products compete for the same municipal budgets, and several cities -- Austin, Oak Park, Sedona -- have already declined to renew Flock contracts over exactly these concerns. Each non-renewal is small revenue; the cumulative signal is that procurement committees now read the press before they sign.

For investors holding the position at an $8 billion mark, the exposure is not a lawsuit, it is churn correlated with news cycles. A surveillance company's revenue quality depends on multi-year municipal contracts, and municipal contracts are the easiest thing in the world for a city council to let lapse quietly.

ShareXLinkedInEmail

Key Sources

2 sources

Reported by 404 Media · Analysis by Value Add Pulse.

← Back to Pulse

THE WIRE in your inbox— Tech, startup & VC news with Trace's take. Free, no spam.