Analysis
Firmus Grid disclosed that it expects to report a loss after tax of $77 million for the first half of the financial year ending June 30, 2027, according to a draft prospectus reviewed by Bloomberg and corroborated by Reuters coverage, as the Australian data center operator prepares to launch its up-to-$5.5 billion IPO on October 6.
The Numbers Behind The Float
Firmus, backed by Nvidia and private equity firm Blackstone, counts Nvidia, Meta and OpenAI among its customers -- a roster that gives this listing a credibility signal few data-center IPOs this year can match. The company could be valued at up to $60 billion after the IPO, a figure that sits in stark contrast to the disclosed $77 million first-half loss forecast and Firmus's own description of itself in the prospectus as historically loss-making. The draft document does not contain forecasts beyond the first half of fiscal 2027, leaving investors to underwrite the rest of the growth story largely on narrative rather than disclosed numbers.
“## What's Changed Since Pulse's Last Coverage Pulse previously reported Firmus targeting up to $5.5 billion in an October 6 IPO launch.”
What's Changed Since Pulse's Last Coverage
Pulse previously reported Firmus targeting up to $5.5 billion in an October 6 IPO launch. This update adds what that earlier filing left open:
- First disclosed loss forecast -- $77M for H1 FY2027
- Potential valuation -- up to $60B
- Prospectus lodging -- October 8
- Institutional bookbuild -- October 6-7
- Retail bidding -- October 12-19
- ASX debut target -- October 22
The Gap Between Customers And Cash Flow
Having Nvidia, Meta and OpenAI as customers is a genuine asset -- it validates that Firmus's facilities meet the technical bar hyperscale AI workloads require. But customer logos are not the same as profitability, and a $77 million half-year loss on a company seeking a $60 billion valuation means public investors are being asked to price five APAC facilities still under construction, plus continued losses at the two that are already live, purely on the strength of who's renting the capacity rather than what the capacity currently earns.
This is the same tension running through SB Energy's own US IPO process, which is asking public markets to price a $439 billion contracted backlog against near-term losses of its own -- both listings are testing whether investors will pay up for long-duration AI infrastructure contracts at face value, or discount them for execution risk and the gap between contracted-future revenue and current profit and loss.
The compressed timeline -- prospectus lodging October 8, institutional bookbuild starting October 6, two days before the prospectus itself is even filed in final form -- leaves institutional investors little room to fully digest the loss forecast before committing capital, a structural feature of accelerated IPO processes that favors sophisticated investors with existing relationships over those relying solely on the public documents.