Illustration for: Apate's AI Agents Get Scammed On Purpose For Fraud Intel

Apate's AI Agents Get Scammed On Purpose For Fraud Intel

Sydney-based Apate deploys AI agents that pose as victims to draw out scammers, then sells the resulting fraud intelligence -- bank accounts, phone numbers, phishing sites -- to banks and telecoms.

ShareXLinkedInEmail

THE RUNDOWN

1

Most AI-for-fraud startups build passive detection models; Apate actively engages scammers to extract intelligence, a meaningfully different approach with different legal and ethical exposure.

2

Apate sells to banks, telecom companies, government agencies and utilities, a customer base that typically moves slowly but pays well once a vendor is validated.

3

The company has raised just under $10 million total, a small base for a product that requires running thousands of agent conversations against real scammers at scale.

4

The founding story -- Dali Kaafar keeping a scam call going 44 minutes at a family picnic -- is a reminder that some of the most effective anti-fraud ideas come from direct, repeated exposure to the con, not from reading fraud-loss statistics.

The VC Read

Value Add VC analysis

The diligence question is unit economics, not the premise: running thousands of AI agents through live scam conversations at scale costs real compute and real engineering time per engagement, and Apate has raised under $10 million to do it. Compare that to Sift and Feedzai, which detect fraud passively from transaction data without needing to sustain a live conversation with an adversary -- Apate's cost structure is closer to a labor-intensive red-teaming operation than a typical SaaS detection product, and that should show up in its gross margins long before it shows up in a press release.

Analysis

Apate, a Sydney-based startup, deploys AI agents that pose as potential victims -- answering scam calls, replying to phishing messages, and joining suspicious social media groups -- specifically to draw out fraudsters and extract details like bank accounts, crypto wallets, phone numbers and impersonated brand names, according to TechCrunch. The company then sells that intelligence to banks, telecom companies, government agencies and utilities, who use it for anti-fraud work, and customers can assign agents specific missions.

Founded in 2024 out of research at Macquarie University in Sydney, Apate is led by founder and CEO Dali Kaafar, with co-founder and chief commercial officer Brad Joffe. The company raised $8.15 million in seed funding in August from Lobby Capital, OIF Ventures, Investible, Concept Ventures and Baobab Ventures, bringing its total raised to just under $10 million -- a modest base relative to the compute and engineering cost of running agent conversations against live scammers at scale.

“Founded in 2024 out of research at Macquarie University in Sydney, Apate is led by founder and CEO Dali Kaafar, with co-founder and chief commercial officer Brad Joffe.”

Apate's approach differs from most fraud-intelligence competitors by design. Companies like Sift and Feedzai build models that detect fraud passively, scoring transactions or flagging anomalies after the fact, without ever engaging directly with a scammer. Apate's model requires sustaining a live conversation long enough to extract actionable details, closer in structure to a red-teaming or honeypot operation than a typical SaaS detection pipeline -- a difference that should show up in cost per engagement, not just in the marketing pitch.

The origin story is unusually concrete for a fraud-tech startup: Kaafar has said the idea came from keeping a scam call going for 44 minutes at a family picnic, extracting details the caller didn't intend to share. That kind of direct, repeated exposure to how scammers actually operate -- rather than working purely from aggregated fraud-loss statistics -- is the kind of product insight that's hard to fake and hard for a larger incumbent to replicate quickly.

Apate's customer base -- banks, telecoms, government agencies and utilities -- tends to move slowly through procurement and security review, which cuts both ways: slower initial sales cycles, but higher switching costs and better retention once a vendor clears the bar. With under $10 million raised, the near-term test is whether Apate can land a handful of named enterprise customers before it needs to go back to the market for a larger round to fund the compute-intensive scale-up its model requires.

ShareXLinkedInEmail

Key Sources

2 sources

Reported by TechCrunch · Analysis by Value Add Pulse.

← Back to Pulse

THE WIRE in your inbox— Tech, startup & VC news with The VC Read, a few times a week. Free to subscribe, no spam.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Sent via Substack · Privacy · or subscribe on Substack ↗