LPs dont invest in them expecting to make outsized returns - they're just trying to minimize their downside.
Happy Holidays everyone! Lets end the year with a bang - 2025 is going to be awesome.
In venture capital, mega-funds exceeding $2 billion (in fund size, not just AUM, which is often much higher) are often celebrated as transformative forces capable of reshaping industries by deploying hundreds of millions in capital with relative ease. However, a deeper dive into the data reveals a more nuanced reality. While these large funds generate significant excitement, achieving the benchmark of 3x DPI (Distributions to Paid-In) remains exceedingly rare. This underscores the inherent complexities and trade-offs involved in managing capital at such scale.
To clarify, being compared to private equity (PE) isn’t inherently negative—it’s more about nomenclature and the risk profile, deployment strategy, and return expectations associated with these investments. Importantly, we continue to rely on these mega-funds to drive innovation by channeling substantial capital into startups. This discussion is focused specifically on the returns for LPs, rather than the broader ecosystem impact these funds have through their investments, which is still significant.
🌟 Out of72 $2B+ VC funds, only3 funds (4%)have crossed3x TVPI, and just1 fund (1%)has achieved3x DPI. (All pre-2020 funds)
🌍 Across a larger dataset,648 $2B+ funds, only15 (2%)have crossed3x TVPI, and just5 funds (1%)managed to cross3x DPI.
These figures underscore how rare it is for mega funds to deliver the outsized returns LPs (limited partners) expect. While these funds wield significant influence and resources, they also face unique challenges that make consistent, high returns elusive.
Meghan Reynolds@MeghanKReynolds
Heard from LPs this week: A data present 🎁
So many convos in ‘24 around fund math. Can a big fund deliver big returns? So, I posed the question to my VC data guru@T_Caldwellfrom@stepstonegroup
How many VC Funds over $2B have delivered over 3x Net TVPI or DPI?
The Scaling Problem📈
Larger funds often require larger investments, which generally means a higher entry valuation. While early-stage funds can take smaller bets on high-potential companies at lower valuations, mega funds need to write bigger checks at later stages, where valuations are higher and returns can be compressed depending on the liquidity markets.
Market Dynamics🌐
With a large fund size comes a need to deploy capital efficiently. This pressure can lead to participation in deals with less favorable terms or chasing companies that have already scaled significantly, leaving less room for exponential growth.
Outlier Dependence🎯
Venture capital relies on outliers—the few companies that deliver extraordinary returns. The bigger the fund, the more difficult it becomes to find enough of these outliers to move the needle significantly on overall fund performance.
Currently almost all the industry money getting more concentrated into just a hand full of funds, almost more than it’s ever been in history.
https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/us-vc-fundraising-concentration-andreessen-horowitz
For limited partners, this data serves as a critical reminder to approach mega funds with a certain understanding. While they have the resources and reputations to attract top deals, their ability to deliver top-tier returns is far from guaranteed.
For venture capitalists, the lessons are clear:
Bigger Isn’t Always Better🔍: Scaling a fund size doesn’t necessarily scale performance. Discipline and focus are essential to avoid over-deployment.
Focus on Quality Over Quantity🏆: Mega funds must remain laser-focused on identifying true outliers and supporting them to success.
Maintain Flexibility🤝: Creating carve-outs for earlier-stage investments or exploring creative capital structures can help offset some challenges of deploying large amounts of capital.
So here is a wrap up from one of the best LPs in the business
Beezer Clarkson@Beezer232
1/ It's that time of year - my LP EOY analysis on the state of venture in a few simple charts & color commentary
Valuations are shifting, fundraising is slowing & LPs face tough calls. But this isn’t the first time we’ve been here—and there’s opportunity amidst turbulence 🧵x.com/i/web/status/1…
7 Replies
As I often emphasize, if you're looking to invest in outliers, groundbreaking technology, and the next big thing, you need to consider emerging managers. These are the true scouts—identifying diamonds in the rough, taking the boldest risks, and positioning themselves for the biggest rewards.
When choosing a manager, ensure they offer opportunities to learn, co-invest, follow on, and actively support their portfolio companies. Keep in mind, building a successful startup takes time. Raising additional capital, scaling operations, and achieving a meaningful exit is a long-term journey. Investing in this space means committing to a partnership that spans years—patience and collaboration are key.
FIND ME: 𝕏@Trace_Cohen/inLinkedIn
Big Desk Energy
startup insights, stories, and vibes sent to your inbox every Tuesday
mail.bigdeskenergy.com/subscribe?_bhba=a912eba6-7a35-4c1b-a9cb-9721b5c72389
The best investors need the information that matters, fast.
That’s why a lot of them (including investors from a16z, Bessemer, Founders Fund, and Sequoia) trust this free newsletter.
It’s a five minute-read every morning, and it gives readers the information they need ASAP so they can spend less time scrolling and more time doing.
Or copy and paste this link to others:{{rp_refer_url_no_params}}
© 2026 Trace Cohen's Vertical Ai Investor Newsletter
1 Unicorn Ranch
Port Washington, New York 11050, United States