Illustration for: Anthropic Walks Away From Its Biggest Deal Ever

Anthropic Walks Away From Its Biggest Deal Ever

Anthropic terminated talks to acquire Israeli AI startup Decart for roughly $6 billion after conducting due diligence, walking away from what would have been its largest acquisition to date.

By the Numbers

~$6B
Reported deal value
~54%
Premium over last round
$3.9B
Decart valuation, May 2026
>$450M
Decart total funding
Oct. 2024
Decart founded
TC
By the AI Desk
Edited by Trace Cohen · Early-stage VC & angel · Founder, New York Venture Partners
2 min read
ShareXLinkedInEmail

THE RUNDOWN

1

Would have been Anthropic's largest acquisition on record, aimed at cutting the cost of training and serving its models with Decart's chip-efficiency technology

2

A collapse *after* deep due diligence -- not before -- raises the question of what Anthropic found that a term sheet didn't already price in

3

Decart stays independent at its **$3.9B** May 2026 valuation rather than being folded into a **$965B**-valued Anthropic

4

A well-capitalized buyer walking away is a signal worth more than another closed round: it says something about Anthropic's bar for infrastructure M&A right now

TC

The VC Read · Trace's Take

Trace Cohen

The diligence item I'd want answered before writing this off as noise: was it Decart's IP ownership on the chip-efficiency tech, or its revenue concentration, that spooked Anthropic post-diligence? Those are very different problems for the next bidder. Decart holding its $3.9B mark independently, with Google and Meta both circling AI infra assets this year, is the actual story here -- not the deal that didn't happen.

Analysis

Bloomberg reported that Anthropic has ended talks to acquire Decart, an Israeli AI startup, for roughly $6 billion -- a deal that would have been Anthropic's largest acquisition to date. People familiar with the matter said the two sides had progressed deep into due diligence before Anthropic pulled out; the exact reason has not been disclosed, though Anthropic and Decart may still pursue a smaller commercial partnership instead of a full acquisition. Pulse has tracked Anthropic's spending and dealmaking closely all year -- this would have been its largest bet yet.

Founded by Israeli engineers Dean Leitersdorf, Orian Leitersdorf and Moshe Shalev, Decart's core product is Oasis, a real-time "world model" that generates interactive video -- effectively a playable game environment rendered frame-by-frame by a neural network at 20 frames per second with no perceptible latency. The company has separately built chip-efficiency technology that reduces the cost of running large AI workloads, which was reportedly the specific asset Anthropic wanted. Decart's funding history:

  • Seed, Oct. 2024 -- $21M, led by Sequoia Capital, with Zeev Ventures
  • Series A, 2025 -- $100M at a $3.1B valuation, adding Benchmark and Aleph VC
  • Series B, May 2026 -- $300M led by Radical Ventures, with Adobe Ventures, Toyota Ventures and Valor Equity Partners, lifting the valuation to roughly $3.9B and total funding above $450M

The company has separately built chip-efficiency technology that reduces the cost of running large AI workloads, which was reportedly the specific asset Anthropic wanted.

Why Anthropic wanted this

Anthropic's economics are dominated by inference and training compute costs, and any technology that meaningfully improves utilization on existing GPU and TPU fleets is worth a premium -- which is presumably why Anthropic was willing to pay roughly 54% over Decart's last private mark. Decart isn't alone in that category: Cerebras and Groq compete on custom silicon for inference speed, while on the video-generation side that Decart's Oasis model also touches, Runway, Luma AI and Google's own Genie project are building comparable real-time world-model technology. Anthropic buying Decart would have combined a compute-efficiency asset with a video/world-model team in one deal -- unusual scope for an AI lab whose M&A history has otherwise skewed toward smaller, narrower acqui-hires.

The counterweight

It's tempting to read a diligence-stage collapse as a red flag on Decart specifically, but deals fall apart after diligence for mundane reasons too -- price renegotiation, key-employee retention terms, or overlapping technology Anthropic decided it could build in-house faster than it could integrate.

Anthropic itself just closed a $65 billion Series H and is preparing an IPO now expected in mid-October, so capital discipline on a cash-and-stock acquisition, even for a lab this well-funded, is not automatically a signal that something is broken at Decart.

What to watch

Decart's board now has to decide whether to run a fresh process with other potential acquirers -- Google, Meta and Nvidia have all been active buyers of AI infrastructure and video-generation talent this year -- or raise a Series C independently at a valuation that has to clear the $3.9 billion bar investors already paid in May. Either path tests whether the diligence findings that scared off Anthropic show up again with the next bidder.

ShareXLinkedInEmail

Key Sources

2 sources

Reported by Bloomberg · Analysis by Value Add Pulse.

← Back to Pulse

THE WIRE in your inbox— Tech, startup & VC news with Trace's take. Free, no spam.