Market & TrendsMay 12, 2026ยท9 min readยทยทLast updated: 2026-09-30

The SaaS Comps Guide: How to Find and Use Public SaaS Comparables

Using the right public SaaS comparables is the difference between pricing a company correctly and leaving millions on the table โ€” or overpaying by the same margin.

Trace Cohen
Founder & Editor-in-chief, Value Add VC โ€” Angel investor, VC, family office, operator and founder ยท Co-founder of BrandYourself and Launch.it ยท 75 investments
75Investments2xCo-founder$200M+Funds Tracked

Quick Answer

Clouded Judgement's median EV/NTM revenue multiple for public cloud software was 3.2x on May 8, 2026, with companies expected to grow more than 22% at 12.6x and those under 15% at 2.5x. To use SaaS comparables correctly, screen by growth rate, NRR, and gross margin โ€” not just sector โ€” then apply a 20โ€“30% private discount to the median comp multiple for private company valuations.

Correction โ€” September 30, 2026

Earlier versions of this guide said the median public SaaS company traded at 6.8x NTM revenue in May 2026 "per BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index data and Jamin Ball's Clouded Judgement tracker," and showed quartile and Rule of 40 multiples. Clouded Judgement's median was 3.2x on May 8, 2026, and we could not find a source for the quartile and Rule of 40 figures. The data, the worked example and the headline now use Clouded Judgement's dated readings.

The median public cloud software company traded at 3.2x NTM revenue on May 8, 2026, per Clouded Judgement. On Nov 26, 2021, that number was 13.5x; on Feb 19, 2021, it was 20.0x. The correction is real, it is documented, and if you are valuing a SaaS company without the right comparables set, you are guessing.

SaaS comps are not optional. They are the foundation of any credible SaaS valuation โ€” whether you are raising a round, making an investment, or running an M&A process. Getting the comps right means knowing which public companies to include, which metrics to weight, and how to translate a public multiple into a private company price. That matters even more when public market sentiment is stretched โ€” BofA's Bull & Bear Indicator hitting a sell signal in August 2026 is exactly the kind of backdrop where the comp set you're using deserves a downside sensitivity check.

What Are SaaS Comps and Why Do They Matter?

SaaS comparables are a curated set of public SaaS companies that share key characteristics โ€” growth rate, gross margin, ARR scale, go-to-market motion, and vertical focus โ€” with the company you are trying to value. The premise is simple: the market has already priced these companies. You use that market pricing to benchmark the private company.

The most commonly used SaaS multiple is EV/NTM Revenue (enterprise value divided by next-twelve-months revenue). NTM is preferred over LTM (last-twelve-months) because it is forward-looking and better reflects growth expectations. Investors pay for the future, not the past.

EV/NTM Revenue

Most widely used SaaS multiple โ€” forward-looking, growth-adjusted

EV/ARR

Used for pre-revenue or early-stage companies where GAAP revenue lags ARR

EV/NTM Gross Profit

Better for comparing companies with very different gross margin profiles

EV/EBITDA

Relevant for profitable or near-profitable SaaS companies with >$50M ARR

Current Public SaaS Comps: The Data (May 2026)

Here is where public SaaS multiples actually sat in May 2026, from Clouded Judgement's May 8, 2026 readings: the median enterprise value (market cap + debt โˆ’ cash) divided by next-twelve-months revenue, overall and by projected growth.

Segment (projected NTM growth)Median EV/NTM Rev (May 8, 2026)
All public cloud software3.2x
High growth (>22%)12.6x
Mid growth (15โ€“22%)5.2x
Low growth (<15%)2.5x
Top five multiples21.1x

Source: Clouded Judgement (Jamin Ball), May 8, 2026. Clouded Judgement publishes medians by growth bucket. Earlier versions of this table also showed quartiles and Rule of 40 splits; we could not find a source for them, so they were removed.

How to Build the Right SaaS Comps Set

The most common mistake founders and investors make with SaaS comps is picking companies that look similar on the surface but have fundamentally different economics. Here is the screen I use:

1. Match gross margins first

SaaS gross margins vary from 55% (infrastructure-heavy) to 85% (pure software). A 70% gross margin company should not be compared against a 55% gross margin company โ€” the underlying unit economics are incomparable. Only include comps with gross margins within ยฑ10 percentage points.

2. Match revenue growth bands

The biggest driver of EV/Revenue multiples is growth rate. Group comps into bands: <10%, 10โ€“20%, 20โ€“40%, >40%. Mixing a 15% grower with a 45% grower in the same comps set produces a meaningless average. Stick within a ยฑ15 percentage point range.

3. Match go-to-market motion

PLG (product-led growth) companies, enterprise sales-led companies, and SMB-focused companies command fundamentally different multiples because their churn, CAC, and expansion revenue dynamics differ. Segment your comps by primary GTM motion.

4. Match ARR scale

A $5M ARR company should not use a $500M ARR company as a comp. Scale affects predictability, churn rates, and growth potential. For private company valuation, use comps that were at a similar scale at a similar stage โ€” look at historical filings if needed.

5. Apply a private-market discount

Private companies are illiquid, typically smaller, and carry higher key-person and concentration risk. The standard private discount to public SaaS comps is 20โ€“30% for Series B+ companies and 30โ€“40% for Seed/Series A. In the current risk-off environment (2024โ€“2026), apply the higher end of these ranges.

Where to Find Public SaaS Comparables

These are the sources I actually use. All are either free or low-cost:

Jamin Ball โ€“ Clouded Judgement

Weekly tracker of public cloud software multiples: the median EV/NTM revenue multiple, overall and by growth bucket.

cloudedjudgement.substack.com

BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index

Bessemer's public cloud index, with constituent-level multiples and financial data. Its headline revenue multiple is an average, not a median.

cloudindex.bvp.com

SEC EDGAR Filings

10-K and 10-Q filings give you exact ARR, NRR, gross margin, and CAC data for any public SaaS company โ€” straight from the source.

sec.gov/edgar

Value Add VC SaaS Dashboard

Revenue multiples, growth and Rule of 40 data for a set of public tech companies (Yahoo Finance data; check the update date shown on the dashboard).

/saas-valuations

Applying SaaS Comps to a Real Valuation

Here is how to translate a public comps set into a private company price. Assume you are valuing a Series B SaaS company with $8M ARR, growing 35% YoY, 74% gross margin, 115% NRR, and no meaningful profitability (Rule of 40 score of ~35%).

Step 1: Identify public compsPull all public SaaS companies with 25โ€“45% YoY growth, 70โ€“80% gross margins, and Rule of 40 of 25โ€“45%.
Step 2: Calculate median comp multipleA 35% grower falls in the high-growth bucket: 12.6x median EV/NTM revenue on May 8, 2026 (table above). That bucket includes everything above 22% growth, so check it against the median of a hand-built comp set of 25โ€“45% growers before relying on it.
Step 3: Apply private discountSeries B with $8M ARR โ†’ apply 25% private discount: 12.6x ร— 0.75 โ‰ˆ 9.5x NTM Revenue. For a deeper look at how that discount moves by stage, see how private SaaS pricing stacks up against public multiples.
Step 4: Calculate NTM Revenue$8M ARR ร— 1.35 growth rate = $10.8M NTM Revenue.
Step 5: Derive valuation$10.8M ร— 9.45x = ~$102M enterprise value. Add cash, subtract debt for equity value.
Sanity check with ARR~$102M EV รท $8M ARR = ~13x ARR. That is rich for a Rule of 40 score of ~35%, which is the point of Step 2: the bucket also contains companies growing far faster than 35%, so a tighter comp set is the check on this number.

SaaS comps are only as good as the selection criteria you use.

Growth rate, gross margin, and Rule of 40 โ€” not industry category โ€” should determine which companies end up in your comp set.

Track live public SaaS multiples and build your own comps set on the SaaS Valuations Dashboard. For broader market context, see the Benchmarking tool at Value Add VC. Originally published in the Trace Cohen newsletter.

Get VC data most people never see

โ€” free to subscribe

Trace's notes on venture, AI and startups, a few times a week. Join 5,000+ subscribers. No spam.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Sent via Substack ยท Privacy ยท or subscribe on Substack โ†—

Add Value Add VC as a preferred source on Google

Frequently Asked Questions

What are SaaS comps and how do you use them for valuation?

SaaS comps (comparables) are a set of publicly traded SaaS companies with similar growth rates, gross margins, NRR, and business model used as a benchmark for valuing a private SaaS company. You identify the median EV/NTM Revenue multiple of your comp set, then apply a 20โ€“30% private-market discount to arrive at a target valuation range for the company you are pricing.

What is the current median SaaS EV/Revenue multiple in 2026?

Clouded Judgement's median EV/NTM (next-twelve-months) revenue multiple for public cloud software was 3.2x on May 8, 2026, versus 13.5x on Nov 26, 2021 and 20.0x on Feb 19, 2021. By growth, the May 8 medians were 12.6x for companies expected to grow more than 22%, 5.2x for 15โ€“22% and 2.5x under 15%. Bessemer's BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index publishes an average revenue multiple instead, which runs above the median, so don't mix the two.

How do you find public SaaS comparables for a private company?

The best free sources for SaaS comps are Jamin Ball's Clouded Judgement Substack (weekly public SaaS multiple tracker), the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, and SEC filings for direct peer analysis. Start by filtering by gross margin (>70%), ARR range, and primary go-to-market motion (PLG vs. enterprise), then narrow to companies with similar growth rates and vertical focus.

What discount should you apply to public SaaS comps for private companies?

The standard private-market discount to public SaaS comps is 20โ€“30% for late-stage companies with >$10M ARR, widening to 30โ€“40% for earlier-stage companies with <$5M ARR. The discount reflects lower liquidity, smaller scale, higher key-person risk, and the absence of a public float. In a risk-off environment like 2023โ€“2026, the discount has been closer to the high end of this range.

What is the Rule of 40 and how does it affect SaaS valuation multiples?

The Rule of 40 is a SaaS health metric where revenue growth rate plus profit margin (typically EBITDA margin or free cash flow margin) should equal or exceed 40%. Clouded Judgement doesn't split its medians by Rule of 40, but its growth buckets show how steep the premium is: on May 8, 2026, the high-growth median (12.6x) was about five times the low-growth median (2.5x). For private company valuation using SaaS comps, crossing the Rule of 40 threshold is the single most impactful benchmark for commanding a premium multiple: it signals that the company can grow profitably rather than burning capital indefinitely to sustain growth.

Companies & investors in this article

Explore 45+ free VC tools, dashboards, and recommended startup software.