Market & TrendsApril 2, 2026ยท11 min readยทLast updated: April 2, 2026

The 2025 IPO Reality Check

Technically, the IPO market reopened in 2025. Economically, it didn't. A deep look at what the data actually shows.

TC
Trace Cohen
3x founder, 65+ investments, building Value Add VC

Quick Answer

The 2025 IPO market was technically active but economically devastating: 15 meaningful venture-backed companies raised $10.4 billion, yet only 4 traded above their IPO price by year-end. The median return was -48.7%, destroying $87 billion in value as public markets repriced private-era valuations against new profitability standards.

If you just looked at headlines, you'd think the IPO market reopened in 2025. Technically, it did. But economically, it didn't.

What we saw was not a return to form, but a controlled release of supply into a market that is still repricing venture-backed companies after the excesses of 2020โ€“2021.

The Snapshot: Activity Without Strength

15

Meaningful VC-backed IPOs

$10.4B

Total raised

4

Trading above IPO price

-48.7%

Median return

This is not what a healthy IPO window looks like. Historically, reopenings are broad-based with positive momentum across cohorts. In 2025, the opposite happened: activity returned, but outcomes deteriorated. The key signal is not issuance volume โ€” it's post-IPO performance.

$87B of Value Destruction

The magnitude of repricing across individual companies:

Figma+250% day one โ†’ now -82% from peak
Circle+199% โ†’ the only consistent outperformer
Gemini$7B โ†’ $0.5B (-93%)
Klarna$45.6B โ†’ -89%
Chime$25B โ†’ -72%
StubHub-74% with $2.85B of debt
NavanBroke IPO price day one โ†’ never recovered

This is not idiosyncratic underperformance. It is systemic repricing. That $87B represents years of optimistic private market underwriting being reconciled in a single event.

Why This Happened

01

The ZIRP Hangover Cleared

The 2020โ€“2021 environment defined by near-zero rates, unlimited growth capital, and minimal accountability on profitability created companies optimized for growth at any cost. By 2025, rates normalized, liquidity tightened, and capital became selective. This reversed the incentive structure that defined the last cycle.

02

Private Markets Lagged Reality

Private markets move slowly โ€” infrequent price discovery, insider-led rounds, valuation smoothing. Public markets move instantly. The IPO became the first true mark-to-market event. This explains why so many companies saw immediate dislocations post-listing.

03

Liquidity Pressure Forced the Cycle

GPs needed distributions. LPs needed liquidity. Companies needed exit pathways. IPOs happened not because conditions were ideal, but because they were necessary. When supply is driven by necessity rather than strength, pricing power shifts to buyers.

04

AI Created a Two-Tier Market

AI introduced a new benchmark for capital allocation. AI infrastructure and semiconductors saw multiple expansion. Non-AI SaaS, fintech, and consumer companies saw continued compression. Investors now have a clear alternative where growth, margins, and long-term narratives align โ€” raising the bar for everything else.

What the Data Actually Says

Growth alone is no longer enough

Companies with strong top-line growth but weak margins underperformed. Companies with moderate growth and strong unit economics held up better.

IPO is no longer a liquidity event

For many companies, the IPO price is the lowest valuation they've seen in years. Lockups, weak aftermarkets, and continuous public scrutiny replaced the traditional step-up.

Venture marks are losing relevance

Markups are not translating into DPI. Exit multiples are lower. Time to liquidity is longer. This is forcing a return to fundamentals in how funds are evaluated.

This is no longer a market driven by momentum, narrative, or cheap capital.

It is a market defined by selectivity, discipline, and real outcomes.

Track live IPO data on the 2025 IPO Tracker and Tech IPO Dashboard at Value Add VC. Originally published in the Trace Cohen newsletter.

Frequently Asked Questions

How did 2025 IPOs perform overall?

2025 was one of the worst years for IPO performance on record. Of 15 meaningful venture-backed IPOs, only 4 traded above their IPO price. The median return was -48.7%, with $87 billion in total value destruction across the cohort.

Why did so many 2025 IPOs trade below their IPO price?

Most 2025 IPOs were priced on private-market valuations built during the 2020โ€“2021 zero-interest-rate era. Public markets, now demanding real profitability and unit economics, repriced these companies sharply at listing. The IPO became the first true mark-to-market event for many of these businesses.

Which 2025 IPOs performed the best and worst?

Circle was the standout performer, returning +199% and remaining the only consistent outperformer. Gemini suffered the steepest decline, falling 93% from a $7 billion valuation to $0.5 billion. Klarna dropped 89% and Chime fell 72%.

What does the 2025 IPO data mean for founders planning to go public?

Founders need to demonstrate durable profitability, not just top-line growth, before pursuing an IPO. The rise of AI has created a two-tier market where AI-native companies attract capital while non-AI SaaS and fintech face continued multiple compression and heightened investor scrutiny.

Explore 45+ free VC tools, dashboards, and recommended startup software.