VC & InvestingMarch 18, 2026·11 min read

VC vs PE Performance: The Data Beneath the Narrative

There is a persistent narrative that venture capital is broken and private equity is outperforming. The data does not fully support that conclusion.

TC
Trace Cohen
3x founder, 65+ investments, building Value Add VC

Quick Answer

In 2024, private equity returned approximately 8% annually versus venture capital's 6%. But the more meaningful divide is DPI: most 2020–2022 vintage VC funds show strong paper gains but near-zero actual distributions, making proven capital return capacity — not headline IRR — the defining measure of manager quality.

The data shows a shift in where value is created, how long it takes to realize, and which managers actually matter.

Private Equity

~8%

Annual return in 2024

Venture Capital

~6%

Annual return in 2024

Distributions increased materially year over year, but remain below long-term averages. Performance is improving on paper faster than it is in cash.

The Core Structural Difference

Private Equity

  • Majority or control ownership
  • Leverage and operational improvements
  • Predictable cash flow businesses
  • Shorter duration to exit

Venture Capital

  • Minority ownership
  • No control over outcomes
  • Power law distribution of returns
  • Long duration with delayed liquidity

This is why comparing headline IRRs between the two can be misleading. The underlying risk profile and time horizon are fundamentally different.

Why DPI Is Now the Only Metric That Matters

For most of the last decade, TVPI was enough. That has changed.

Today, LPs are overwhelmingly focused on DPI — actual cash returned. TVPI captures unrealized value. IRR is influenced by timing assumptions. DPI reflects reality and cannot be manipulated.

Many 2020–2022 vintages show strong TVPI on paper

DPI remains near zero or low single digits for most of those funds

Older vintages are taking longer to convert TVPI into DPI due to exit delays

Dispersion Is Still Extreme

The most underappreciated reality in venture is dispersion. Across funds in the same vintage:

Top quartile

3x–5x+

Median

~Breakeven

Bottom quartile

<1x

In venture, a single investment can determine the entire fund outcome. In private equity, dispersion exists but is narrower.

What This Means for LPs and GPs

For LPs

  • → Prioritize managers with a history of distributions, not just markups
  • → Underwrite longer fund durations and delayed liquidity
  • → Diversify across vintages rather than trying to time the cycle
  • → Expect lower near-term cash flows from venture portfolios

For GPs

  • → Raising the next fund requires realized performance
  • → Ownership and follow-on strategy matter more than initial entry
  • → Portfolio construction needs to account for longer hold periods
  • → Clear exit pathways must be part of underwriting, not an assumption

The real divide is no longer between VC and PE.

It is between funds that can return capital and those that cannot.

Explore fund performance data on the VC/PE Performance Dashboard and VC Performance tracker at Value Add VC. Originally published in the Trace Cohen newsletter.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do VC and PE returns compare in 2025?

Private equity delivered roughly 8% annual returns in 2024 versus venture capital's approximately 6%. While PE's edge in headline performance is real, the comparison is complicated by fundamentally different risk profiles, time horizons, and the distinction between paper gains and actual distributions.

Why does DPI matter more than TVPI for evaluating VC funds?

DPI (Distributed to Paid-In) measures actual cash returned to investors and cannot be manipulated, whereas TVPI reflects unrealized markups that may never convert to liquidity. Most 2020–2022 vintage VC funds carry strong TVPI on paper but near-zero DPI, meaning LPs have seen little real return despite years of hold time.

What is the return dispersion within venture capital funds?

Venture capital dispersion is extreme: top-quartile funds return 3x–5x or more, median funds roughly break even, and bottom-quartile funds return less than 1x invested capital. A single investment can determine an entire fund's outcome, which is why manager selection in VC is far more consequential than in private equity.

What should LPs prioritize when evaluating VC fund managers?

LPs should prioritize managers with a demonstrated history of actual distributions rather than just paper markups. Given prolonged exit delays and near-zero DPI in recent vintages, LPs should also underwrite longer fund durations and diversify across multiple vintages rather than trying to time the market cycle.

Explore 41+ free VC tools, dashboards, and recommended startup software.