VC
Value Add VC
⚡HomePulse⚡Helpful Apps📝Blog
← Value Add PulseAIAI music demonetized

TIDAL Cracks Down on AI Music by Cutting Off Monetization

TIDAL, the streaming service owned by Block, will stop paying royalties on AI-generated music -- demonetizing tracks its systems detect as AI-made without banning them outright. The policy is one of the clearest moves yet by a major platform to protect human artists' royalty pool as a flood of synthetic tracks threatens to dilute streaming payouts.

TIDAL (owned by Block)
Platform
No royalties on AI music
Policy
Demonetize, not ban
Approach
Protect human-artist payouts
Goal
AI-music detection
Key Tool
TC
Trace Cohen
Early-stage VC & angel · Founder, New York Venture Partners
June 30, 2026
1 min read
KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR VCs & FOUNDERS
1

It sets a precedent for how platforms treat AI-generated content economically

2

Demonetizing rather than banning is a middle path others may copy

3

It protects the finite royalty pool human musicians depend on

4

Detection becomes the battleground as AI music grows indistinguishable

TC
The VC Read · Trace's TakeTrace Cohen

Demonetize-don't-ban is the cleverest answer I've seen to the AI-content problem: you can't reliably police creativity, but you can kill the financial incentive to spam. Since streaming royalties come from a fixed pool, every synthetic track is literally taking money from human artists -- so this is economic self-defense dressed as policy. Expect Spotify and Apple to study it closely. The whole thing rests on one fragile pillar, though: detection. As AI music becomes indistinguishable from human recordings, the rule is only as strong as the classifier behind it, and false positives that punish real artists would be a disaster. The fight moves to detection accuracy.

🤖 AI Landscape →

TIDAL will no longer pay royalties on music it identifies as AI-generated, the Block-owned streaming service confirmed, opting to demonetize synthetic tracks rather than remove them outright, according to TechCrunch and The Verge. The move is among the most concrete responses yet from a major platform to the surge of AI-made music flooding streaming catalogs.

The economic stakes are the crux. Streaming royalties are paid from a finite pool divided across all tracks by share of plays, so every AI-generated song that draws streams siphons money that would otherwise reach human artists. As generative tools make it trivial to mass-produce listenable tracks, platforms face the prospect of synthetic content diluting payouts and gaming recommendation systems -- a structural threat to the people the services were built to support.

“TIDAL's chosen path -- demonetize but don't ban -- is a notable compromise.”

TIDAL's chosen path -- demonetize but don't ban -- is a notable compromise. An outright prohibition raises thorny questions about detection accuracy, artistic tools and free expression, while doing nothing invites abuse. Cutting off the financial incentive aims to deter spam-style AI uploads without policing creativity, a template other services wrestling with the same problem may follow.

The competitive backdrop is industrywide. Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer and YouTube have all grappled with AI music, fraudulent streams and disclosure rules, and the major labels are pushing for protections and licensing frameworks. The hard part for everyone is detection: as AI music grows indistinguishable from human recordings, reliably identifying it -- without false positives that punish legitimate artists using AI tools -- becomes the decisive technical challenge.

The bear case is enforceability: detection is imperfect, bad actors will adapt, and a demonetization rule is only as good as the system that flags content. What to watch: how accurate TIDAL's detection proves, whether rivals adopt similar policies, and how the music industry settles the broader fight over AI training, licensing and disclosure.

ShareXLinkedInEmail

Originally reported by The Verge. Analysis and editorial commentary by Value Add Pulse.

← Back to Pulse

Markets Now

live
S&P 500▲+1.13%
7,440.43
NASDAQ▲+1.82%
25,820.15
NVDA▼-0.39%
$194.97
MSFT▲+4.46%
$368.57
AAPL▲+2.40%
$281.74
GOOGL▲+2.89%
$353.65
META▲+3.63%
$562.60
AMZN▲+5.78%
$240.14

Read Next

AIFree for U.S.

Google Makes Gemini's Personalized AI Image Generation Free for All U.S. Users

Google opened Gemini's personalized AI image generation -- powered by its 'Nano Banana' model and able to pull context from a user's Gmail, Google Photos, YouTube and Search -- to all U.S. users for free, after previously gating it behind Plus, Pro and Ultra subscriptions. With Gemini past 750 million monthly active users, making a premium, data-personalized feature free is an aggressive distribution play against OpenAI and a bet that personal context is Google's structural edge.

AIHardware tease

OpenAI Teases Dedicated Hardware for Its Codex Coding Agent

OpenAI is teasing new hardware built around Codex, its AI coding agent, signaling ambitions to move beyond software and into purpose-built devices for developers. The hints fold into OpenAI's broader hardware push -- the secretive 'io' effort it built with former Apple design chief Jony Ive -- and suggest the company sees agentic coding as a flagship use case worth its own physical form factor.

AIMobile launch

Cursor Launches a Mobile App to Steer Your Coding Agent on the Go

Cursor released a mobile app that lets developers monitor and direct their AI coding agents from a phone -- kicking off tasks, reviewing changes and steering long-running work away from the desktop. It reflects a shift in how software gets built: as agents do more autonomous coding, the human role moves toward supervision, which no longer needs to be tethered to an IDE.

@Trace_Cohen·t@nyvp.com